It is the conservative position after all.
The debate should have provided the conservative defenders of property rights with a perfect example of how the right to own property also protects the 1st Amendment rights of assembly and religion by supporting the building of the mosque.
Instead, we hear lip service given to the property rights position while demanding that the need to be “sensitive” requires an all-out assault on the building of a mosque, several blocks from “ground zero.”
Just think of what might (not) have happened if the whole issue had been ignored and the national debate stuck with war, peace, and prosperity. There certainly would have been a lot less emotionalism on both sides. The fact that so much attention has been given the mosque debate, raises the question of just why and driven by whom?
He doesn’t mince words throughout.
A lot of attention has been paid to non-Mosque issues in the past few days. But not in the Media which has been concentrating entirely on how no one one is paying attention to anything but the Mosque. Nervy, that’s what it is!